Alliant health system Essay

From my point of scenery no strategy is perfectly sound. at that place are some or other lacking points in both strategy. In case of alliants strategy, although they have made quite advancements but in last 5yrs they have hit a few unexpected obstacles and drawbacks that has staggered their progress. alliants were all been able to lay the base. The working of alliants was facing the problem of in amity to the total quality management philosophy.For alliants to eliminate the problem the quality abut still needs a jumpstart ,even the physicians show broader there view point, implementation of an IT system that fully supports total quality management by getting them the data and the important facts it need to have to in collaborate innovation in time to come in their organisation. Even the CEO wolford state that he cannot talk some both one knowledge base which is doing advantageously puff up than its competitors. alliants were finding a problem to get plans into implementat ion. Even as per the statistics the unable to monitor rate was around 2% to 70%.How well have they implemented the quality strategy? Alliants thought of a natural effect plan to introduce total quality management with the attend to of quality management team with a 10 pointer action setup. This time they were determent that the implementation of plans takes up systematically. Mainly 4 area of TQM strategy were taken of well. 1) CARES+ this process was implemented all across the alliants. This helped in releaseing from the traditional system of the planning to the advantage of the quality which was super cost-efficient. 2) EQUIP- this was an idea to springtime voice to the employees.They were allowed to share their point of view and give their ideas, innovations and communicate with the higher management of the organisation. 3) . Quality Improvement Teams- these teams brought the technicality and peculiar(prenominal) analytical tools to bring implementation in action. 4) . Critical Paths 3. Evaluate their randomness technology needs. Believed information technology (I/T) is a key in the future strength of TQM Need expert systems computers to help the mind Was a shift in focus to patient-oriented systems rather than functional, stove pipe applications that met narrow departmental needs.Physicians, clinical support professionals, and administrators could share information and drive continuous improvement in service HELP offered advice on possible diagnoses, cost-effective treatments, election scheduling, and drug contraindications. New I/T strategy offered significant advantages oer Alliants existing patchwork of stand-alone systems System worked concurrently advice was useable as patient was being treated Had the potential to improve coordination dramatically by collecting data from all corners of the hospital into a maven patient-centered system 4. Would you proceed with HELP?From my point of view, yes we should proceed with HELP. As this up(a) the quality, saving time and even the paper. This system has helped the hospital in do the whole organisation a one working unit. This is basically a single patient orient system that has all the information about every patient who has been admitted in any of their hospital in any other area. This has eliminated the repeated data and has been proved to be more productive, efficient and well organised. 5. What would you do to make sure implementation is successful? The move which i would take will involve