The Will of God and Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Will of God and Ethics - Essay ExampleThe fundamental irresolution of immortal is, Does God tell us what to do and therefore it is adept, or does God happen to be right and tell us the right thing to do? Does justice precede theology, or theology precede justice? The distinction is important. If one states that good precedes God, one might be being blasphemic, as God might do something evil in any respect, obedience to God is a immaculate logical consequence, not a highest duty. But if one states that God precedes good, the question is, why? As Sayre-McCord puts it, many provoke thought the right answers to these questions are found in an appeal to God. On their view, moral principles are the expression of Gods will they are His commands to us and they depress their authority from their source. In important ways, though, this merely shifts the puzzles clog a step. Whatever problems one might have making sense of eternal transcendent standards re-emerge when trying to m ake sense of an eternal transcendent being who might issue commands...One is also go forth with the difficulty of explaining why Gods commands are authoritative (2007). ... in light of which He counts as morally perfect), in which case speaking of morality as consisting of Gods commands will not explain the origin or temper of these independently existing standards...Alternatively, one might eschew an appeal to Gods knowledge or goodness and carry that there is no independent standard for Gods will and nature...If we reject the idea that Gods commands reflect His knowledge of right and wrong, and reject as well the idea that God is all good, it seems reasonable to wonder why his commands have any special authority (Sayre-McCord, 2007). Euthyphro exposes some of the obvious logical dilemmas of the theological position admirably. Socrates asks Euthyphro, What is the meaning of fear? For attention can hardly be used in the same sense when applied to the gods as when applied to othe r things. For instance, horses are said to require attention... When Euthyphros offers that piety is other obedience or share of the Gods, it begs the question, why would omnipotent entities care for what a human being has? Either the gods want the obedience of deal who can offer them nothing, in which case the gods are either petty or helpless, or they do not, in which case the gods do not care. This difficulty is especially applicable to the modern world assume an omnipotent and good God essentially obviates the idea of obedience or sacrifice, since God can get anything He wants. Further, Socrates exposes the issues of theodicy and hermeneutics, the question of what God or the Gods want. And further, Euthyphro, the gods were admitted to have enmities and hatreds and differences? If the gods had differences, then how could one be pious? accentuate to represent the general opinions of the god, or only obey directives of all the gods? Since