Texas V Johnson

Texas v Johnson legal expert Brennan’s opinion in Texas v. Johnson Justice Brennan cited several First Amendment cases to show that a antecedent was habilitate to encompass protection for expression which is not mouth or written (i.e., protection for symbolic actions such as protesting departure through arm-band wearing, sit-ins, etc.).

The cases cited, including the current one, were guinea pig to the O’Brien test, which is a esteem to determine if the State’s statute ignore be considered valid, in that it specifically forbids non-communicative e xpression for the benefit of bring corporeal government interest . In defense, the State increase two interests to justify the limitations on expression: preventing disturbance of the recreation and protect the flag as “a symbol of nationhood and national unity.” The court of justice deemed that the first qualification was not subject to the O’Brien test, and that the entropy was a direct maneuver to ...If you indigence to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper