Discuss the reasons for the growth and decline Essay -- essays researc

Up until World War II, Imperialism had been a study part of nuance throughout the world. The conquering and occupying of other lands had been prominent in all of the major world empires. The Romans, Ottaman Turks, Egyptians, Mongols, Syrians, Greecians, Babylonians, Muslims, Persians, and others had all thrived on the occupation of other territories. However, as the procession of military warfargon and techonolgy increased, the stakes increased, the wars longer, the casualities higher, and the controlling of vast amounts of land became harder as people sought ethnic diversity and clung to their heritage harder. The last of these great imperialistic empires stands with Great Britian and France. Other european powers in the 1800s also had their hit in the cookie jar of imperialism, including belgium, italy, and Germany, but the powerhouses existed with Great Britian and France. Up until a little after World War II, in the 1950s and 60s, did imperialism last. The questions asked n ow is how did European powers manuever their way into the lives of other ethninticies, and why didnt it last? Around 1870, imperialism in Africa escualted, with her lantern slide line quickly being snatched by Great Britian, France, the Dutch, Germany, and the Italians, and then they started operative their way inward. The Industrial Revolution caused sore wealth to emerge, and this peeled wealth was invested in occupying hot territories, for either a sign of prestige or dominance, probably both to an extent. Techonology is growing, and communications is increasing, thus making it easier to occupy new lands and peoples. Medical techonolgy is increasing, and the ability to combat new diseases helps the imperialistic powers overcome the new pestilences that they encounter. The increasing growth of the R.R made it easier to transport goods and materials needed to occupy territory. The race in Europe is growing, and these new lands argon possible place to be as well. But why did countries like Great Britian seek to shake off enouormous amounts of money on provinces without oft coming back to them? One supposition is the Accident theory that says their was no real intent in the colonization that took place. The theory says that once one land was taken, the surrounding land would... ...by the British by combining three tribal groups together. One the British left, much blood was shed over what a nigerian was or was not. at that place was no coherant agreement on what these new people stood for.Goals for the future are almost dependant on the new countries ability to industrialize and contain up with the Western powers. Establishing a stable government is one tread toward political and economic growth and stablity. Agreeing on what a country is about, and how they are to support themselves are vital. Holding fast to an identity, as Americans, Frenchmen, and the British do, however aids in the development of old things, and the creation of new techonol ogy. However, as afore mentioned, because of their being no distribution of weatlth in the world, and within the new countries, the new money is only spread out over the growing existence providing no real enhanced standard of living for anyone, the gap lead become wider and wider economically between the more developed countries and the third world. sparing developement is the key to success, and without that, these once colonized countries will only continue to struggle.